jacques Posted January 6, 2018 Report Share Posted January 6, 2018 Le principe est simple : le meneur propose une définition en latin ou en français, les participants font des propositions et le vainqueur devient le nouveau meneur. Attention : - Il s'agit bien sûr d'un mot latin, si possible mentionné dans le Gaffiot. - Sa nature est précisée. - La définition peut ne correspondre qu'à un seul sens de ce mot. - Elle peut être également plus générale et "englober" de ce fait plusieurs sens. - Elle pourra éventuellement se présenter sous forme d'énigme. - Les participants ne proposent qu'un mot à la fois ; ils peuvent aussi poser des questions au préalable. - Nous verrons ultérieurement s'il convient de limiter le nombre des propositions que peut faire un même joueur. - N'hésitez pas à faire toute suggestion utile. Précision importante : il arrivera que plusieurs mots puissent correspondre à la définition proposée, surtout si cette dernière est générale ; il faut néanmoins trouver le mot précis auquel avait songé le meneur pour gagner. Ce dernier pourra apporter des précisions afin de guider les participants vers la bonne solution. _______________________________ I. - QVÆRENDVM NOMEN SUBSTANTIVVM. Haec est verbi definitio : OMNIA QVIBVS HOMINES A BESTIIS DIFFERVNT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sicerabibax Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 Omnia ? Plurali numero ? Dicam : "verba" ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raoul Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Num etiamnunc respondere possum? Si mihi licet, "cogitationes" dicam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 9, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Sane doctas expressistis conjecturas, quarum mala fortuna neutra valet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 9, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Verbum quaerendum ejusdem originis est ac unum e definitione, non plurali numero. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raoul Posted January 10, 2018 Report Share Posted January 10, 2018 ejusdem originis? "humanitas" Nonne ejusdem originis est ac "homines"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 10, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2018 Recte dixisti ! Tibi alterum verbum proponendum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raoul Posted January 10, 2018 Report Share Posted January 10, 2018 Me autem valde adjuvit consilium tuum! Ego illam definitionem propono: "Cum eo celerius eo" (substantivum nomen inveniendum) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 11, 2018 Nonne cum EQVO celerius eas ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raoul Posted January 11, 2018 Report Share Posted January 11, 2018 Mea sententia, peritior es! "Equus" erat enim rectum verbum. Tibi (si placet) ludendum. Si alii lusores conveniant, valde gaudeam... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 11, 2018 Nunc aenigma quaerendum. Philosophia mihi consolationi fuit. Quis sum ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raoul Posted January 11, 2018 Report Share Posted January 11, 2018 Inter plures... "Cicero", qui multas lacrimas fuderat, philosophiam certe desiderabat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 11, 2018 Sententiam tuam probo, sed non valet. "Consolationem" verbum scripsi quo facilius invenires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raoul Posted January 12, 2018 Report Share Posted January 12, 2018 Ehu... "consolatio" parum me adjuvat... mihi forte dicere possis utrum Graecus an Romanus esset vir ille cui philosophia consolationi esset Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 12, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2018 Vir romanus erat. Quinto saeculo pCn Romae natus est. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raoul Posted January 12, 2018 Report Share Posted January 12, 2018 Si "quarto" saeculo dixisses, ego autem "Augustinus" (CCCLIII natus) dixissem, at dixisti "quinto"... ita ut cato linguam meam dare debeam, nisi alteram indicationem mihi dare possis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted January 13, 2018 Report Share Posted January 13, 2018 Il y a 11 heures, raoul a dit : Si "quarto" saeculo dixisses, ego autem "Augustinus" (CCCLIII natus) dixissem, at dixisti "quinto"... ita ut cato linguam meam dare debeam, nisi alteram indicationem mihi dare possis Bonjour, A.M.S.B. peut-être? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raoul Posted January 13, 2018 Report Share Posted January 13, 2018 J'avoue mon ignorance: Que signifie A.M.S.B? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted January 13, 2018 Report Share Posted January 13, 2018 il y a 38 minutes, raoul a dit : J'avoue mon ignorance: Que signifie A.M.S.B? Je ne souhaitais pas vous priver de trouver l'identification possible de l'auteur: A.M.(T)S.B.: Anicius Manlius Torquatus... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 13, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2018 Non temporibus erravi : ille philosophus quinto saeculo natus, sexto mortuus est. Bonos auctores constat post antiqua tempora fuisse... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raoul Posted January 14, 2018 Report Share Posted January 14, 2018 Merci Bill et Jacques. En grattant bien sur le net, je trouve, né à Rome en 480 , un Anicius Manlius ,non pas Torquatus mais Severinus Boethius --> "Boèce" connu pour avoir écrit: "Philosophiae Consolatio". Je présume donc qu'il s'agit bien de notre homme. Rectene dixi? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 14, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2018 Jam recte ! E quibus tam curiose perquisivisti suscipi possunt haec : "In tela veritas"'. Je posterai un extrait de cet auteur dans une rubrique que j'ai l'intention de consacrer à la littérature latine du Moyen Age. Bravo aussi à Bill, qui avait trouvé. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLACKSTONE Posted January 15, 2018 Report Share Posted January 15, 2018 Merci ! Si je n'ai pas encore participé, je suis les développements avec beaucoup d'intérêt ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted January 16, 2018 Report Share Posted January 16, 2018 Le 14 janvier 2018 à 09:54, raoul a dit : Merci Bill et Jacques. En grattant bien sur le net, je trouve, né à Rome en 480 , un Anicius Manlius ,non pas Torquatus mais Severinus Boethius --> "Boèce" connu pour avoir écrit: "Philosophiae Consolatio". Je présume donc qu'il s'agit bien de notre homme. Rectene dixi? Selon Universalis et d'autres , l'identité complète est bien Anicius Manlius Torquatus Severinus Boethius. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacques Posted January 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2018 Torquatus n'est pas admis chez tous les spécialistes, mais peu importe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.